The Panel System

Tom Downs

Many years ago I decided to come up with a simple system to help players of all levels who struggle with solid point construction. Not all of us have sound natural instincts when it comes to playing points, and at the end of the day, I know that playing good points is a big part of a player becoming the best that they can be. It also helps students progress quickly. After all, we have to learn how to use the tools we have to maximum affect.

The panel system devides the court into three sections.

The Panel System is an easy way for players to better use the court and understand high percentage tennis. It is not a system that forces people to play robotic tennis. Rather, it is used as a guideline to improve point play. When a student of mine improves their point play by using the panel system, I find they usually start to make better decisions in general during point play and get a little more creative with their patterns. My goal for them is to get to the stage where they do not need to use this system at all.

What is the panel system?

The Panel System is where the singles court is split up into three sections perpendicular to the net. The three sections are not equal. The first section is on a right-handers forehand side located three racquet lengths inside the singles sideline. It is is termed P1 for panel 1. The second third is the largest third and starts from the P1 line and goes all the way to three racquet lengths away from the other singles side line. This panel is termed Panel 2. The third panel is the remaining space that is three racquet lengths between the sideline and panel 2. I use thick yellow lines to highlight these sections on the court.

Basically, if I am playing a point and the opponent hits my shot into panel 1 or 3, I play back crosscourt. This is because the opponent has either played a shot down the line, which means my highest percentage reply is usually crosscourt or they've hit a ball that goes crosscourt across my body, and therefore I play that shot crosscourt.

Figure 2

If my opponent plays a shot into P2, the shot probably hasn't traveled across my body and therefore I change direction and go down the line. If the shot my opponent plays does go into P2 and does go across my body, I still play down the line. If a ball lands right on the border of a panel, the ball is played back crosscourt. The idea is to help people play high percentage tennis by better understanding their own side of the court. When players know what their shot options are with regards to shot selection from the baseline, they usually play higher percentage tennis.

The panel system is also very important for learning how to recover after a shot. I cannot tell you the amount of times I see players of all levels recover too far along the baseline or not far enough. For example, if I receive a crosscourt backhand from my opponent that lands in P3 (Fig 2), I hit my shot back deep crosscourt, and to determine my recovery position, I draw a straight line from where my shot bounces through the service T on my side all the way through my baseline. Where the line intersects on my baseline is the place I recover to. This formula is used for every shot I hit.

I use the panel system to determine a players recovery position after a return of serve (Fig 3). I find that this has really helped my students because many of them, for example, will hit a forehand return off a first serve from the deuce court down the line and then they will not recover far enough. Being in correct position after a return of serve is absolutely crucial so that the opponent cannot take instant control of the point.

For net play, I use the basic principle that most approach shots go down the line and that players cover the line and must be able to anticipate the crosscourt reply. I like for players to approach down the line unless the opponent always expects a down the line approach. Two other reasons for approaching crosscourt may be if the opponent has the down the line approach shot covered, or just to mix things up occasionally. The reasons behind approaching down the line are so that we have less court to cover when coming into the net and the opponent has less angle to work with.

Figure 3

Forehand Dominant Players

So many players in todays game, especially at the higher levels, look to use their forehands to control points. As time goes on, I believe players at all levels of the sport will become more dominant forehand because bigger forehands equals shorter points. The players that I coach who are dominant forehand, and who struggle to know which balls to hit as forehands, are the ones who benefit from the panel system. Generally, I like these players to look to use their forehands when an incoming ball from the opponent lands in P1 and P2. The same recovery principle I established with the basic panel system applies. Too many times, I see dominant forehand players hitting backhands in P2. Forehand players must try to use their forehands as often as possible in P2 because this is a big upgrade from hitting a backhand. As I stated earlier, and it is worth stating again, bigger forehands equals shorter points.

Of course there are exceptions to this rule. For example, if I am a dominant forehand player, and if a player rips a ball hard at me through the P2 area in the direction of my backhand, the pace of shot does not allow me the time I need to move around my backhand to hit a forehand, so I hit a backhand down the line. I like my forehand dominant players to have the ability and mindset to use their backhand to set up their forehands, which is another reason as to why the panel works so well for forehand players. An example of the backhand setting up the forehand is when a dominant forehand player hits a down the line backhand from the P2 area, because the highest percentage shot the opponent can hit in reply to the down the line backhand is either crosscourt or through the middle, which should enable the dominant forehand player to then hit a forehand and take control of the point or re establish control.

I like my students to play baseline games with the panel system marked on one side of the court. The player on the side of the court with the panel system marked needs to follow the playing guielines of the panels. The player on the opposing side of the court can play anywhere they like. Play a baseline game to 11. See who wins and make note of who plays the higher perecntage tennis. Make note of who keeps more balls in play. Following this, keep the court marked with the yellow lines and play a regular set.

If you are a forehand dominant player, do the same as above but just follow the guidelines mentioned in the article for forehand dominant players. Make note of who is controlling the points. Ask yourself the question "Am I hitting more forehands than usual?" "Am I getting short balls and more opportunity balls now that I am following the panel system?"

Give the panel system a go, regardless of you level of play, if you are having issues constructing points. Maybe if you are a player who possesses a good degree of creativity, but lacks good shot selection options, you can use the panel system to bring some shot selection discipline to your game. If you are a player who has a lot of shot selection options off of a certain ball, maybe the panel system can bring some self discipline to your game because it will make you simplify your options. 

The Panel System is a great guideline for point construction. But as time goes on, I trust that this system will improve your point play to the extent where you no longer need it. 

Your comments are welcome. Let us know what you think about Tom Downs' article by emailing us here at TennisOne.

Tom Downs

Tom has and extensive coaching background, and has been a member of the Institute team for several years. He has served as our Head Staff Professional, and is currently the Traveling Coach for Institute players. He has traveled with several of our Tour players including Laura Granville and Carly Gullickson, who won the US Open Mixed Doubles title in 2009.

Tom has worked with junior and other professional players, including Sam Stosur and Rennae Stubbs, at all 4 Grand Slam events, as well as other major tournaments around the world. Tom graduated from the University of South Florida in 2005 with a degree in communications. As a successful junior player, Tom represented Australia, and was consistently ranked in the top 10 in all age groups in Australia. He played college tennis at South Carolina State University and was a member of their conference championship team in 2004.