TennisOne Lessons
![](/images/ads/tennisone1.jpg)
Ball Control - Distance
Wayne Elderton
This is the final installment of the series on Ball Control. During the series we have covered all the Ball Controls of Direction, Height, Speed, Spin, and now finally, Distance.
The motto of the series has been: No matter your level, success in tennis really comes down to one simple thing: “making the little round yellow fuzzy thing go where you want it to.” Manipulating the ball is the essence of the game.
Distance and Tactics
Controlling space is a big part of tennis tactics. Putting your opponent in locations that are not an advantage and locating yourself in positions of greater advantage makes for a winning game. Space wise, a singles court is almost three times longer than it is wide. That means there’s a lot of potential territory to exploit if the Distance of a shot can be manipulated.
“Hit it deep” is a mantra of most tennis coaches. The idea being, if an opponent is pinned far back into the court, it is very difficult for him to hurt you. Balls hit to you from way back have more distance to cover so they will likely be less powerful and possibly shorter.
“Pull them short” is another successful tactic. It is a little riskier since, they may capitalize on their net position. However, if done well, a short ball will make your opponent run a long way and pop up a weak ball they have to dig up from the ground. Making an opponent stumble up to the net also opens up the whole backcourt to lob into. None of us played tennis very long before we fell victim to the old drop-shot then lob pattern. Most pro players have a drop-shot in their repertoire to hurt opponents with.
Controlling the distance of the ball also means the ball can be placed at the feet of a net-rushing opponent. Short angled shots are another way to put opponents in trouble. In other words, there are a good number of tactics available if one can control distance.
Guillermo Coria uses his drop shot to take
control of a point. |
For players at the net, the use of distance becomes even more effective since, not only can they volley it deep, but the ball can be hit even shorter and with greater angle than would be possible with a groundstroke.
Technique for Distance Control
Just like in the rest of this series, the point needs to be stressed that tennis technique needs to be connected to tactics. Practicing “isolated” technique is not the most effective way to improve. Isolated technique is typically taught in the form of a specified one-size-fits-all stroke model (take it back like this, swing like that, and follow-through to here). It is movement for the sake of itself, and not related to playing the game well. Good technique should always make the ball do what you need it to. Good technique includes not only good mechanics (efficiency) but good Ball Control as well (effectiveness).
The key to technical effectiveness is what happens when the ball contacts the racquet. This is the most critical moment in all of tennis. Distance is a combination Ball Control. It is made up of a recipe of three of the other Ball Controls, Height, Speed and Spin all combine to make a Distance.
To understand this better, let’s take the three Ball controls as elements in making a Distance. If we keep two of them constant we can see how the remaining one influences distance:
- If Spin and Speed are constant, hitting higher will make the ball go further. Conversely, hitting lower will make it go shorter.
- If Height and Spin are constant, sending the ball faster will make it go further. Reducing the speed will make it land shorter.
- If Height and Speed are constant, adding topspin will arc the ball and make it land shorter. Adding underspin will elongate the arc and make it land further unless, a lot of underspin is added which will actually do the opposite and make it land shorter (for a full treatment of Spin, see my earlier article in this series, “Ball Control-Win with Spin”).
Sound complex? Just remember, it’s only rocket science! For most players, adding a little bit of all three (Height, Speed, and Spin) will be the way they control things. The big key is to understand that what you want to do determines which combination you choose.
For example, in a baseline exchange, if your intention is to pin the opponent behind their baseline, sending the ball higher over the net with a bit more speed will work well. If it goes long, adding a little topspin will arc the ball in, but maintain the penetration of the court. Correcting the long ball by slowing the speed down (which would also shorten the distance) may not be a good option as the opponent could take advantage of the weaker ball.
When hitting shorter to pull an opponent in, a short/low underspin ball will give most players trouble. Hitting shorter by adding topspin and slowing the speed would also produce a short ball but, it would sit-up and be an easy shot for the opponent.
The key rule for determining when to hit short (a drop-shot) is: “Never attempt a short shot unless your opponent is further from the net than you are.”
When is it a good time to try a short shot? (P=Player O=Opponent)
![](/club/lessons/elderton/distance/courts.jpg)
Receiving Different Distances
Sending different distances is only one side of the story. Receiving variations of distance comes with its own set of challenges. When it comes to receiving deep balls, there is a misconception that stereotypes aggressive tennis as always taking the ball early. In the "age of Agassi," every coach had players standing inside the baseline hitting shots. Fortunately, coaching is more enlightened now. Moving back to hit a very deep ball is a necessary movement that all top pros perform.
Moving back is not the crime that the "aggressive" coaches make it out to be. Neither is taking the ball early. The mistakes are made when either of those are done at the wrong time.
For example, is it effective to hit a ball using a half-volley and impacting at knee level or below? Can a player make a quality shot in that situation? Most players want to do more than just get the ball back, but that is about all one can do with a low-impact, half-volley. The tiny advantage gained by taking time away from the opponent is totally negated by the likelihood of a poor quality shot.
Andre Agassi moved back often at
opportune times. |
Roger Federer starts inside the court but
moves back for a better shot. |
Don’t let any coach try to tell you that when pros move back it is always a mistake and if they could, they would have moved forward to take the ball. If the ball is landing deep enough, top players would rather back-up, take the ball at a better height, and be able to take a fuller swing at it (which is still taking it early by the way). The timing isn’t as difficult and they can neutralize their opponent more easily. It is a purposeful choice, not a mistake. Agassi (I use him since most coaches use him as the ultimate example of hitting early) backed up a lot; however, he earned his aggressive position on the line frequently by making his opponent’s cough up weaker balls.
Now, if they could have taken the ball at a good height by moving in, but let the ball drop because they backed up, that may have been a tactical error (but not always).
The depth of the ball in relation to your location makes the choice of taking it early a smart one, or a poor one. A good player must learn when and how to back up and take the ball and, when and how to move forward and take it early. Both skills are required for top tennis. Standing inside the baseline doesn’t make one aggressive (especially if the depth of the ball disagrees), capitalizing on the proper opportunities to be up there at the appropriate time does.
Federer using a left/left footwork to hit a
shorter ball. |
Andy Roddick using a right/left footwork to hit a shorter ball. |
For short balls, top players use a variety of footwork to get to the ball. The challenge is to move forward but ensure that your shoulders get sideways to load for the shot. To solve this problem (running forward but performing a sideways shoulder turn), we see right-handers jumping off the left foot and landing on the left, or stepping on the right foot (with a shoulder turn) and landing on the left.
The thing recreational players can learn from this is to avoid the racquet-out-in-front, face-the-net, shovel-the-ball-up shot.
Serving and Distance
Distance control isn’t just for groundstrokes and volleys. Serves that penetrate the service box give returners more trouble. Hitting totally flat and deep into the box is difficult because the "window of acceptance" over the net is small. In other words, if you hit a flat serve low over the net, it could land short. Hitting it higher might send it out. It is a very small difference in the net clearance. Most recreational players don’t serve that hard so their ball flies in an arc. When they start to serve harder, they hit it out way more than in. They become good servers when they learn to spin the ball, which allows for a higher net clearance, an arced trajectory, and still maintain good speed.
Like the other shots, the secret to a deep serve is the combination of Speed, Height, and Spin. Find the combination that allows a solid serve that lands deep and is consistent. It is the balance that escapes most players (mostly because they don’t know what they are looking for).
Distance Control Drills
Many players practice drills that make them run from side to side; however, up and back movement is almost ignored. Here are some drills that help players both send different distances and receive them as well.
- Baseline Deep/Short Drill: This is a drill for practicing moving up or back from the baseline. The “Distance Attacker” starts at ¾ court, drops the ball to themselves, and can start by either hitting short (drop-shot or short angle), or deep.
The idea is to get the “Distance Defender” in trouble. The “Distance Defender” either moves back for the deep ball or forward for the short ball and the point is played out. Play up to 7 then switch roles.
- Gain Territory Drill: This drill is for practicing jumping on short balls and trying to achieve a dominant court position. Set-up the court with markers at the sideline to mark distance. The first marker is at ¾ court and the second is between the net and the serviceline (2 feet in front of serviceline). Set-up these distance markers on both ends of the court.
Starting from the baseline, Player 1 feeds a ‘friendly’ ball to Player 2 and the point begins. Players can win the point any way; however, the scoring is based on their position. If the point ends and the winning player is behind the ¾ court marker, they win one point. If the winning player is between the net marker and ¾ court, they win 2 points. If they are in front of the net marker, they win 3 points. Play up to 11. Players alternate who starts the point.
- Deep Serve Drill: This drill helps players to make a more effective serve and to take advantage of shorter serves when returning. Markers are set up in the service box ¾ of the way from the net to the serviceline. The “Server” plays a full game (No Ad scoring). Their goal is to serve both first and second serves past the marker (hit a deep serve). The “Returner” should look to take advantage of any serve that lands shorter than the marker. Play a short set to 4 games.
My hope is, that by taking in all the information in this Ball Control series, and practicing its on-court application, players can break out of the tendency to simply practice strokes and really learn how to play effectively by controlling the ball. That is the beginning of training with a Game-based Approach.
Your comments are welcome. Let us know what you think about Wayne Elderton's article by emailing us here at TennisOne.
![](/images/hm_blu_line.gif)
Wayne Elderton
Wayne is the Head Course Conductor for Tennis Canada Coaching Certification in British Columbia. He is a certified Canadian national level 4 coach and a PTR Professional. For two consecutive years he was runner-up for Canadian national development coach-of-the-year out of nominated coaches from every sport. Wayne has also been selected as Tennis BC High Performance Coach-of-the-year.
Wayne is currently Tennis Director at the Grant Connell Tennis Center in North Vancouver. He has written coaching articles and materials for Tennis Canada, the PTR, Tennis Australia , and the ITF. He is a national expert on the Game-based Approach.
For more information on the Game-based approach, you can visit Wayne Elderton's website at www.acecoach.com
|
|