Among the highly skilled players, the forehand topspin groundstroke offers the most diversity within the parameters of an acceptable foundation or technique. Unlike other shots in tennis, (where deviation from a recognized foundation seldom produces optimal, proficient results), the forehand topspin groundstroke has a great deal of “leeway.” However, this degree of variance must be understood within the context of elemental components of skilled topspin execution.
Just because there is variety in this shot does not guarantee that players who use variations outside of the key component elements will be successful! However, when we identify the diversity—and recognize the key foundation within each diverse implementation — we can then move forward to understanding what we ourselves will want to accomplish with this shot.
Evolutionary Versus Necessary Change
Understand, once players develop the proper “foundation” for the forehand, they will almost always ‘evolve’ their stroke in some way, shape, or form. This explains the wide diversity mentioned above. However, there is another level of diversity we see among recreational and club players; one that is not based so much on evolution but on need. Players who learn a poor foundation (or develop habits that are detrimental to a solid foundation), create change out of necessity. That is, because of a particular flaw (or flaws), they tend to create solutions to hitting shots with form that doesn’t resemble that which we see “skilled” players use.
In order to properly makeover any shot, an individual must recognize the inherent flaw in the stroke. This is important because ignorance of the flaw will limit any sustained improvement and the player will tend to revert back to using the patterns that they had previously gained comfort and familiarity with—even in the limited success of such use!
Goals
The goal of any developing player is to be able to hit more effective shots more consistently and to be able to defend against more effective shots hit by more skilled opponents. That means we need to be able to handle—and potentially hit more effectively—balls hit to us that are lower, harder, more severely angled, and have more spin and depth. To accomplish this, we must be able to replicate a swing pattern on command within the context of the desired direction, spin, speed, and aim.
Click photo: Note the differences and similarities between
Rafael Nadal’s open stance forehand above and Andy Murray’s below.
Understand that when we play less advanced players, balls coming to us are going to be less challenging than those hit by more advanced players. This is one of the big reason players who learn rudimentary patterns (just so they can start “playing tennis” fast) can’t advanced beyond the lower level of the game! The typical introductory grips and swing patterns associated with what I would argue as “beginner” strokes fail miserably when the player wants to ‘transition’ from this form to more advanced form later. Thus, we have literally millions of players who suffer from such ingrained methods and are frustrated because they see many other players (newer to the game) move passed them.
This is why players eventually recognize the need for an “Extreme Make-over.” With that in mind, within each flaw or swing problem, I will offer up suggestions to help resolve the problem.
Problem: Changing the Plane
The most common obstruction to developing control and more effective shot-making is the problem of changing the plane (or hitting surface) of the racquet within the contact zone. This problem can actually encompass several issues:
The racquet-roll: This is the most common pattern where the player typically uses a swing pattern that first opens the face of the racquet on the backswing. This initiates the need to roll the racquet to a more closed position at some point if the player hopes to keep the ball from going sky-high!
The pattern is also caused by players who try to hit topspin by actually rolling the racquet over the ball. This is usually more of an unconscious action, but one that does nothing in terms of creating topspin! Quite simply, the ball is not on the strings long enough for this rolling action to actually create any topspin. In fact, depending on the exact contact point the player can end up producing a flat or even a sliced ball.
Forehand Fence Drill
Tip: The common “Wiper” move that is often used to describe the modern forehand is a great analogy for solving the racquet roll. Stand in front of a fence with your left hip touching the fence (right-handed player). Swing your forehand from the unit turn towards the fence as in hitting a normal forehand. When the racquet approaches the fence, wipe up across the fence (as in moving it like a “windshield wiper”), and finish up and over towards your left side without changing the congruent plane of the racquet. Keep the racquet flush against the fence and repeat this many times until you can feel the action in your stroke. This pattern will help generate desired topspin and, at the same time, limit any rolling action
Internal rotation of the forearm: This is where the player turns the forearm to bring the racquet to contact instead of using articulating a stroke with the body and arm working together. Typically, when a player doesn’t feel confident, they will limit the arms movement and "slap" at the ball using this internal rotation. However, this rotation makes the racquet open up on a horizontal plane and then closes on the same plane. So, unlike the racquet roll previously mentioned, this pattern tends to make balls spray out wide.
Internal Rotation of the Forearm
Tip: Players who rotate the forearm reduce the value of the contact zone. To change this, try to “carry” the ball on the strings towards the target. While you can’t really carry the ball on the strings, the attempt will force you to swing through the ball and the target line more effectively instead of rotating the racquet out of the swing plane too soon.
The Push: This is usually the result of the aforementioned problems. When players lose the ability to control shots, they lose confidence and resort to pushing the racquet fairly square to the target using an almost “bunting-like” swing. This type of action can effectively control the ball’s direction but severely limits the ability to create spin. These types of players are known as “dinkers” because they must play within the context of what I call “Gravity Reliance.” This is the pattern of play where players hit the ball “hard enough to clear the net, but soft enough for gravity to bring the ball back down safely into the court.”
Tip: A pushing stroke is often characterized by the player facing the net too early. Try to stay sideways much longer than what feels normal. This will force you to create the angular swing pattern that results in optimal racquet head speed. In other words, keep your body facing the side fence while you aim for the crosscourt angle on the opposite side of the fence.
The Hack: The Hack is usually one step ahead of the Pusher - but not much better! These players slice everything usually because they have discovered it is easier to control the ball than simply hit flat and push the ball hard.
The slice is a fairly easy way to control the ball for several reasons: Since all balls after the bounce will have some degree of topspin or forward spin added, the slice shot creates what I call the “Spin Advantage.”
So,
when a player hits with slice or under-spin against an incoming ball that has topspin he is essentially hitting with the same spin the ball already has. Thus, hitting a slice only changes the ball’s direction, not the spin element.
A slice tends to “feel” more comfortable because of this fact. Hitting topspin against any ball that has bounced with topspin requires the stroke to change the ball’s rotation and direction. A ball with a lot of topspin, (essentially a “heavy” ball that we hear many commentators on television comment on), requires a lot of topspin to counter the spin of the incoming ball. So if a player has a flawed groundstroke (and can't generate enough topspin to counter that of the incoming ball, the player is more or less forced to hit a slice. While in and of itself, the slice is not a "flawed" stroke, it is often not as effective in certain situations and is simply a shot that players default to because they can’t execute a more effective topspin stroke.
Tip: Because the slice is a completely different stroke than the topspin drive, there is no tip to overcome the use of the slice. Play some practice games with a similar level partner and agree that no one will hit a slice. While there are certainly times a slice should be played, by forcing each other to hit topspins in every instance, the player will not digress and hit the slice at every opportunity.
Footwork Problems: One of the most common causes of poor stroke foundations can be traced to footwork problems. The most common problem is when players step away from the ball with their front foot on closed or neutral stance forehands, (this would be the left foot for right-handed players), or allow the back leg to swing around during the contact phase of the shot. This is where the right leg (again, for right-handed players), sweeps around the body during the forehand stroke. Both of these patterns pollute the integrity of the swing, causing the foundation of the player’s stroke to literally change during contact. There is a subtle movement the pros use in hitting their forehands where the back leg either “kicks back”, toe-drags, or simply stays down during the contact phase of the stroke. It is often missed by observers because of the recovery step that occurs immediately after the proper footwork pattern.
Tip: The solution to this situation is to consciously maintain the back foot on the ground and do it excessively until you get comfortable with not swinging the leg around.
Solutions
Now that we have identified the most common problems of the forehand topspin groundstroke (and provided tips to overcome them), we can create patterns to change these problems and be on a path to developing a more effective forehand. Remember, however, that the propensity for players to revert back to their old habits is extremely strong—especially in the heat of competition. This is the biggest obstacle to any stroke pattern change. If a player ever hopes to master any new stroke, the player must employ the pattern in every opportunity. If the player reverts back to an old, familiar pattern, even one time, the tendency for the player will be to do it again and again out of comfort and familiarity. For some reason, players who miss shots with the new stroke become easily frustrated and revert back to what they find more comfortable, even though they have been missing these same shot with the older pattern for years.
Click photo: Classic Open Stance forehand by James Blake; note the full unit turn, use of the off hand and arm, loading of the right leg, the explosive thrust, but minimal body rotation after contact.
James Blake’s closed stance forehand: Note the back leg stays back through the contact phase, the unit turn uses the off hand to take the racquet back, and the plane of the racquet remains the same throughout the stroke.
Grip
There is a wide range of grips among skilled players, from eastern forehands to full western grips. Sometimes it can help create a change in a stroke by simply using a more extreme grip. Many players who roll the racquet use a weak eastern or even a continental grip. These grips create a far more open racquet face and tend to increase a player’s chance of rolling the racquet closed during the stroke.
Tip: Starting over with a very neutral eastern forehand grip can help players learn to overcome habits they may have developed with more extreme grips. However, if you already are using an eastern forehand grip, sometimes it can help change a swing element by using a more extreme grip.
Swing Path
If a player uses a loop swing, they often lose consciousness of the racquet face within the swing. While a loop is a common element of many top-level players, I have seen where the loop can create problems when players are introduced to it too early in their development.
A straight-back swing makes for an easier pattern for players to control the racquet within the contact phase of the stroke. While we like to think of the swing as a fluid, rhythmic stroke, if a player is struggling with a forehand, the need to breakdown the stroke into controllable components is paramount. Establishing a proper racquet position on the backswing, one that won’t deviate and makes it easy to create a forward path to the proper contact point is desirable.
Tip: A straight-back swing makes for an easier pattern for players to control the racquet within the contact phase of the stroke. While we like to think of the swing as a fluid, rhythmic stroke, if a player is struggling with a forehand, the need to breakdown the stroke into controllable components is paramount. Establishing a proper racquet position on the backswing, one that won’t deviate and makes it easier to create a forward path to the proper contact point is desirable.
Keep the Plane the Same
This phrase, one of my favorites, describes the desired racquet face throughout the swing. With any grip, with any amount of spin, the racquet face must not deviate during the stroke, especially within the contact window, if the player hopes to define the stroke and create a regular, repeatable, and, most important, reliable swing path. Whether you are hitting a flat ball or one with tremendous spin, the hitting surface of the racquet, (the “Plane”), must maintain its integrity if the player ever hopes to hit more reliable and more effective shots.
Click photo: Note the closed stance forehand on the run by James. Note too the back leg’s position at contact and then the “Brake step” used to stop his inertia.
Footwork
The forehand can be hit with many footwork patterns correctly. However, there are certain points one must understand so-as to not hit with the right footwork pattern at the wrong time! There are open stances, neutral stances, closed stances, reverse pivot patterns, and recovery or “brake step” patterns that can all be used for particular situations.
Open Stance: This is the choice among all highly advanced players when they have time to set up for the stance. The torque produced by an open stance, the coil and uncoil it provides, produces the maximum angular momentum for a rotational swing pattern which the forehand topspin should use. However, if a player is off balance or moving while swinging, the stance is nearly impossible to hit within the context of balance and recovery.
The open stance is where a player “loads up” on the inside foot, (right foot for right-handed player), leaves the left foot open and generally parallel to the baseline, then coils up the upper body usually using the off-hand to help the upper body complete this “unit turn. The uncoiling and upward thrust off the loaded right leg produces significant power when used efficiently.
Closed or Neutral Stance: This “old-school” stance is still used by all players, especially when they are on the run to their forehand side or stepping into the stroke. The use of the closed stance is accomplished when the player plants their left foot (for right-handed players), while making contact with the ball. The back toe usually will stay down for a moment during the contact phase to prevent over rotation at contact. On the run, this stance helps the player hit off the pivot (left) foot, and then recover with the right foot after the contact phase.
Brake Step: Following any neutral or closed stance, the player will usually want to hold the back leg back during the contact phase (usually observed as a toe-drag or a back leg “kick back”), followed by this same leg swinging around to “brake” their sideways movement so the player can push back toward the middle of the court. This is very subtle and can be missed if not closely observed.
Many players assume the pros swing the back leg around with the swing, but in fact, they keep this back leg back momentarily until the contact phase is complete.
Reverse Pivot: The reverse pivot is usually used on high bouncing forehands when a player sets up with an open stance. The move is to load the inside foot as described with the open stance, but the, as contact is initiated, the outside leg swings back. This actually works well for the forehand as the reverse pivot brings the hitting shoulder and arm forward while the off side of the body pivots back. It is still a fairly advanced footwork pattern. You will see many clay-court players use this move because of the typical higher bouncing balls they see when playing on slower surfaced clay courts.
Conclusion
As described, there are many ways to hit forehand groundstrokes. Based on the grip, the stance, the position of the ball, and the movements encountered, there can be several patterns which a player needs to recognize, develop and employ. Making over the forehand usually involves several key points, (those listed in this article, especially!), and requires clear understanding of the “why” as well as the “How.” I hope these points will be helpful to you as you work to develop your forehand into a weapon!
Why do millions of tennis players stagnate at levels far below their potential?
Why are making changes in one's game so frustratingly difficult?
What tennis teaching methods are disruptive or detrimental to player progression?
Read David W. Smith's TENNIS MASTERY and learn not just how to avoid playing at mediocre levels, but how the best players in the world Master the sport of tennis!
“With a depth of knowledge and fresh perspective, TENNIS MASTERY is set to become a manual for tennis instructors and a measure for tennis literature.” Richard Wigley, Director, Kayenta Tennis Center , Ivins Utah .
Take in David Smith's 30 plus years in the tennis teaching industry. This 335-page manual will provide for every level of player as well as support for all tennis-teaching professionals, a blueprint for reaching higher levels of tennis mastery.
David W. Smith is the Director of Tennis for the St. George Tennis Academy in St. George Utah. He has been a featured writer in USPTA's magazine ADDvantage in addition to having over 50 published articles in various publications.
David has taught over 3000 players including many top national and world ranked players. He can be reached at acrpres1@email.msn.com.