Features

Strategic Insights From
Pancho Segura

A Tennis Legend Explores Agassi-Sampras
and Davenport-Hingis 

by Joel Drucker 


A Most Unlikely Legend

The essence of tennis is a struggle of personalities. Few people in the history of the sport are as adept at understanding this battle more than Pancho Segura. If you’re not familiar with “Segu,” here’s a quick summary:

Short, bowlegged, and unorthodox, Segura was the most unlikely of 
tennis legends.

Originally from Ecuador, Segura virtually taught himself to play tennis, mastering a two- handed forehand that Jack Kramer once called the single greatest shot in the history of the sport. Migrating to America in the ‘40s, he was a top ten amateur. But only when he joined Kramer’s barnstorming pro tour did Segura truly come into his own. “I was a short guy, so I had to use my brain every point of every match,” Segura once told me. Jousting with the likes of Tony Trabert, Ken Rosewall and, most of all, the mighty Kramer and Pancho Gonzales, he honed an all-court, tactically-adroit game that earned him the name “Sneaky.” By the late ‘50s -- nearing 40 -- Segura was routinely defeating Rosewall and able to consistently beat virtually anyone else save for Gonzales. 

Once he retired in the early ‘60s, he began teaching, first at the Beverly Hills Tennis Club and then, for more than two decades, at La Costa Resort & Spa near San Diego. Thousands of players at all levels have benefited from his strategic insights. Most notable was Jimmy Connors. Segura worked with Jimbo from Connors’ late teens well into his days as the best player in the world.  

Even now, nearing 80, Segura remains an ardent analyst, traveling each year to at least two Grand Slams, constantly watching on TV and always ready to dispense his wisdom.  Just returned from a trip to the Australian Open, he offered his insights into two of the game’s more compelling rivalries: Agassi-Sampras and Hingis-Davenport. His lessons are as applicable for us weekend warriors too. 

Segura on Agassi-Sampras 

These days, Agassi is so fit  “he’s trying to be a killer every day."

Segura coached Agassi for a brief period in 1993. As fate has it, Agassi at that time was woefully out of shape and suffering from a wrist injury that would eventually require surgery. Oddly enough, much of what Brad Gilbert helped Agassi with comes directly from Segura’s playbook: Play intelligently based on the score and what the opponent can truly hurt you with. But back then, Agassi lacked the physical and emotional fitness to pull off Segura’s vision. 

These days, Agassi is so fit that, according to Segura, “he’s trying to be a killer every day -- just like Connors, Kramer, Newcombe. To play Agassi from the baseline you’ll have to be out there for four hours. He’s an incredible shotmaker. And he’s fit like Lendl, but playing with a certain kind of variety.” 

But Segura still believes Sampras is “just an inch better. He’s more of a complete player. He can volley, he can serve better, hit his forehand better on the run. On the run, he’s a better player, a better athlete than Andre.” 

Agassi, though, “is a firmer hitter. His concentration is a bit better because he knows he has to hit ten shots to win a point. Sampras only has to hit a few shots to win a point.” 

As a counter puncher himself, Segura thinks there’s a way to pierce Sampras. “It bothers me that Sampras doesn’t have the killer concentration of a Becker,” says Segura. “Sometimes I think Pete just wants to believe he’s superior and should therefore beat you -- and at times he’s not. He’s a bit like Gonzales, maybe of all like Lew Hoad. The game comes too easy to him, so he’s not always all over you every day. You can often feel like you’re in the match against him.” 

Sampras is “an inch better... (but) he’s not always all over you every day.

Regarding the future of the Agassi-Sampras rivalry, Segura reiterates Jack Kramer’s longstanding theory: Even if you’re better by just an inch, you don’t just beat someone 52 percent of the time. “Sampras knows in his heart he’s a better player. If he and Agassi played ten times, Sampras should win seven -- maybe more. If I was Sampras’ coach I’d make him hit his backhand down the line more, really move forward into the ball more rather than lean back and hit it crosscourt. Agassi’s edging over, so make Andre run wide to his forehand. Don’t forget, Sampras has a good slice approach shot. 

“It’s a colorful, beautiful rivalry, a fantastic contrast between the greatest server and the greatest returner. Indoors and grass you pick Sampras. Clay and slower hardcourts you pick Agassi. Agassi should win in Paris, Sampras at Wimbledon. The Open, that’ll be the big one.” And you can bet your life that Segura, his sharp silver mane of hair resting over his dark skin, will be smack dab in New York watching every point.   

Next Issue -- Part Two: Hingis-Davenport 


Oakland-based Joel Drucker has been involved in tennis for many years as a player and writer. He’s written extensively about the game for such publications as Tennis Magazine, HBO Sports and Biography Magazine. He also served as the technical editor on Patrick McEnroe’s book, Tennis For Dummies. For TennisOne, Joel will be writing regularly for TennisONE about the pro tennis circuit. 


Last Updated 9/1/98. To contact us, please email to: webmaster@tennisone.com

TennisONE is a registered trademark of TennisONE and SportsWeb ONE; Copyright 1995. All rights reserved.