<% ns_puts [mkm_getnavbar] %> |
The Singles Game25. Hindrance of a Player USTA Comment: See Rule 13 and its USTA Comments regarding lets. Case 1. A spectator gets into the way of a player, who fails to
return the ball. May the player then claim a let? Case 2. A player is interfered with as in Case No.1, and the
Umpire calls a let. The Server had previously served a fault. Has he the
right to two services? Case 3. May a player claim a let under Rule 25 because he
thought his opponent was being hindered, and consequently did not expect
the ball to be returned? Case 4. Is a stroke good when a ball in play hits another ball
in the air? Case 5. If an Umpire or other judge erroneously calls
"fault" or "out", and then corrects himself, which of
the calls shall prevail? Case 6. If the first ball served-a fault-rebounds, interfering
with the Receiver at the time of the second service, may the Receiver
claim a let? Case 7. Is it a good stroke if the ball touches a stationary or
moving object on the Court? Case 8. What is the ruling if the first service is a fault, the
second service correct, and it becomes necessary to call a let either
under the provision of Rule 25 or if the Umpire is unable to decide the
point? |
Last Updated 1/1/01. To contact us, please email to: webmaster@tennisone.com TennisONE is a registered trademark of TennisONE and SportsWeb ONE; Copyright 1995. All rights reserved. |